Weekly/W22 · May 25–31, 2026

AgentCrush Weekly Digest — W22, May 25–31, 2026

Weekly Digest

W22 · May 25–31, 2026

Published May 31, 2026·RSS·JSON

If W21 was four rankings side by side, W22 was the week we made them defensible — and pushed the newest one through the LLM Gateway so AI agents can actually read it. The index covers 1,339 indexed agents, of which 105 are evidence-ranked across the four categories. The headcount tightened from W21 as new risk-flag filters activated; surviving entries carry more signal density per name.

Two threads landed. First, confidence tiers shipped across all four categories — every ranked agent now grades high / medium / low / provisional based on the fraction of available signals it actually covers. The principle from W21 is now universal: a score and its certainty travel together. Second, the Agent Payments Stack got its full LLM Gateway treatment — a dedicated /api/rankings/agent-payments-stack/llm-summary endpoint, a canonical answer page, and a blog post explaining why Coinbase and Stripe are the only two projects spanning five of six layers.

We also wired up weekly_delta — every agent now carries its seven-day rank change, computed nightly. The first real movement data lands in W23. From next week onwards, “biggest moves” in this digest will be computed, not curated.

Where the rankings stand

1Qwen83
2Gemini82
3Mistral AI74
4DeepSeek74
5Llama70
6Cohere53
7Hermes34

Standings at W22 close. Every figure is live at the public /api/rankings/*/llm-summary endpoints. Scores shift as upstream signals (HuggingFace, LMArena, on-chain) refresh.

Agent Payments Stack — top 5

v1.0-aps · full ranking →
1Coinbase5/6 layers18
2Stripe5/6 layers18
3Circle4/6 layers13
4Google AP22/6 layers9
5Brex2/6 layers8

Six-layer map of agent payments. Only Coinbase and Stripe span five layers; everyone else specializes. The full ranking covers 38 projects.

Signal highlights

Confidence tiers extended to every category. Model families already had it. W22 added wrapper views for tokenized, service, and developer — each exposing a confidence_tier column on top of the base score. Tokenized agents broadly grade high (six-signal coverage); service grades medium because adoption + recency + protocol breadth don't always co-occur; developer grades vary widely with active-weight density.

Risk flags shipped. A unified agent_risk_flags_v1 view layers two concrete checks: concentration_risk for tokenized agents whose top-10 holders exceed 80% of supply, and dormancy_risk for developer agents with no GitHub push activity in 90+ days. Sybil and volume-anomaly checks are stubbed pending the right signal feeds.

The LLM Gateway now covers all five categories. Adding the Agent Payments Stack endpoint completed the set: an AI agent reading agentcrush.xyz/llms-full.txt can now find a canonical summary of every category we rank, in JSON, with methodology version + source URLs attached.

Methodology page got changelogs. Each category section now carries its own version history — five entries deep — so anyone auditing a score can see when (and why) the methodology behind it changed.

This week in data

1,339

Agents indexed

105

Evidence-ranked

6

LLM Gateway endpoints

38

APS projects tracked

What shipped

All Rankings →Methodology →Blog →RSS →