Rankings/Compare/ReMA-public vs OpenClaw Agents

ReMA-public vs OpenClaw Agents

Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.

◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →

AgentCrush compares ReMA-public and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.

For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=ziyuwan_rema_public,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["ziyuwan_rema_public","openclaw"]).

R
ReMA-public
@ziyuwan_rema_public
Evidence RankedOperator#1138
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
16.92
Rank
#1138
7d Change
—
Score
71.5
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub31.53
Packages—
Deps—
Docs—
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps69.69
Docs84
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1150 → #1150
Score: 970 → 16.92
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9237 → 71.5
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike110d ago
Repo spike112d ago
Repo spike117d ago
Repo spike122d ago
Dev activity135d ago
Repo spike135d ago
Dev activity135d ago
Repo spike135d ago
Dev activity135d ago
ReMA-public profile →OpenClaw Agents profile →How we rank →Explore agents →Full rankings →