fireworks-tech-graph vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares fireworks-tech-graph and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=yizhiyanhua_ai_fireworks_tech_graph,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["yizhiyanhua_ai_fireworks_tech_graph","openclaw"]).
f
fireworks-tech-graph
@yizhiyanhua_ai_fireworks_tech_graph
Evidence RankedBuilder#72
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
38.91
Rank
#72
7d Change
—
Score
77.14
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub78.72
Packages26.39
Deps—
Docs60
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.27
Docs90
Discourse98.64
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #78 → #78
Score: 6449 → 38.91
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9231 → 77.14
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike1h ago
Repo spike5h ago
Repo spike9h ago
Repo spike13h ago
Repo spike17h ago
Dev activity36d ago
Repo spike36d ago
Dev activity36d ago
Repo spike36d ago
Dev activity36d ago