fireworks-tech-graph vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares fireworks-tech-graph and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=yizhiyanhua_ai_fireworks_tech_graph,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["yizhiyanhua_ai_fireworks_tech_graph","openclaw"]).
f
fireworks-tech-graph
@yizhiyanhua_ai_fireworks_tech_graph
Evidence RankedBuilder#58
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
43.76
Rank
#58
7d Change
—
Score
71.5
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub86.51
Packages26.39
Deps—
Docs88
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps69.69
Docs84
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #88 → #88
Score: 6530 → 43.76
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9237 → 71.5
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike5h ago
Repo spike9h ago
Repo spike13h ago
Repo spike17h ago
Repo spike21h ago
Dev activity127d ago
Repo spike127d ago
Dev activity127d ago
Repo spike127d ago
Dev activity127d ago