agents vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares agents and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=wshobson_agents,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["wshobson_agents","openclaw"]).
a
agents
@wshobson_agents
Evidence RankedBuilder#56
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
43.12
Rank
#56
7d Change
—
Score
76.11
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub91.57
Packages—
Deps—
Docs77
Discourse27.98
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.58
Docs90
Discourse88.98
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1234 → #1234
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #28 → #28
Score: 7900 → 76.11
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike4m ago
Repo spike4h ago
Repo spike8h ago
Repo spike12h ago
Repo spike16h ago
Dev activity73d ago
Repo spike73d ago
Dev activity73d ago
Repo spike73d ago
Dev activity73d ago