Rankings/Compare/tinyclaw vs OpenClaw Agents

tinyclaw vs OpenClaw Agents

Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.

◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →

AgentCrush compares tinyclaw and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.

For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=warengonzaga_tinyclaw,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["warengonzaga_tinyclaw","openclaw"]).

t
tinyclaw
@warengonzaga_tinyclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#451
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#28
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
26.09
Rank
#451
7d Change
Score
7900
Rank
#28
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub59.56
Packages
Deps
Docs74
Discourse
Ecosystem
Coverage: low
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1017 → #1017
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #28 → #28
Score: 79007900
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity10d ago
Repo spike11d ago
Repo spike17d ago
Dev activity17d ago
Dev activity24d ago
Dev activity119d ago
Repo spike119d ago
Dev activity119d ago
Repo spike119d ago
Dev activity120d ago
tinyclaw profile →OpenClaw Agents profile →How we rank →Explore agents →Full rankings →