Rankings/Compare/tinyclaw vs OpenClaw Agents

tinyclaw vs OpenClaw Agents

Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.

◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →

AgentCrush compares tinyclaw and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.

For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=warengonzaga_tinyclaw,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["warengonzaga_tinyclaw","openclaw"]).

t
tinyclaw
@warengonzaga_tinyclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#371
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
26.06
Rank
#371
7d Change
Score
76.11
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub59.33
Packages
Deps
Docs74
Discourse
Ecosystem
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.58
Docs90
Discourse88.98
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #529 → #529
Score: 422426.06
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 923376.11
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity6d ago
Repo spike9d ago
Dev activity13d ago
Repo spike17d ago
Dev activity20d ago
Dev activity73d ago
Repo spike73d ago
Dev activity73d ago
Repo spike73d ago
Dev activity73d ago
tinyclaw profile →OpenClaw Agents profile →How we rank →Explore agents →Full rankings →