agent-browser vs zcf
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares agent-browser and zcf across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=vercel_labs_agent_browser,ufomiao_zcf or MCP compare_agents(["vercel_labs_agent_browser","ufomiao_zcf"]).
a
agent-browser
@vercel_labs_agent_browser
Evidence RankedOperator#30
View profile →
z
zcf
@ufomiao_zcf
Evidence RankedBuilder#31
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
47.31
Rank
#30
7d Change
—
Score
46.79
Rank
#31
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub—
Packages95.81
Deps—
Docs86
Discourse48.14
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub81.44
Packages49.1
Deps—
Docs80
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #50 → #50
Score: 6786 → 47.31
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #81 → #81
Score: 6391 → 46.79
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
No recent signals
Repo spike7h ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike2d ago
Dev activity3d ago