agent-browser vs evolver
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares agent-browser and evolver across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=vercel_labs_agent_browser,evomap_evolver or MCP compare_agents(["vercel_labs_agent_browser","evomap_evolver"]).
a
agent-browser
@vercel_labs_agent_browser
Evidence RankedOperator#41
View profile →
e
evolver
@evomap_evolver
Evidence RankedOperator#42
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
45.74
Rank
#41
7d Change
—
Score
45.63
Rank
#42
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub—
Packages95.66
Deps—
Docs86
Discourse34.33
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub85.13
Packages45.5
Deps—
Docs72
Discourse17.38
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #48 → #48
Score: 6810 → 45.74
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #91 → #91
Score: 6478 → 45.63
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
No recent signals
Repo spike10h ago
Repo spike14h ago
Repo spike18h ago
Repo spike1d ago
Dev activity1d ago