zcf vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares zcf and Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=ufomiao_zcf,mukul975_anthropic_cybersecurity_skills or MCP compare_agents(["ufomiao_zcf","mukul975_anthropic_cybersecurity_skills"]).
z
zcf
@ufomiao_zcf
Evidence RankedBuilder#47
View profile →
A
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
@mukul975_anthropic_cybersecurity_skills
Evidence RankedBuilder#48
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
45.13
Rank
#47
7d Change
—
Score
44.91
Rank
#48
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub81.43
Packages41.65
Deps—
Docs80
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
GitHub95.39
Packages—
Deps—
Docs93
Discourse20.39
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #96 → #96
Score: 6392 → 45.13
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #60 → #60
Score: 6752 → 44.91
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity8d ago
Repo spike8d ago
Dev activity11d ago
Repo spike11d ago
Repo spike16d ago
Repo spike3h ago
Repo spike8h ago
Repo spike12h ago
Repo spike16h ago
Repo spike20h ago