SuperAGI vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares SuperAGI and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=transformeroptimus_superagi,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["transformeroptimus_superagi","openclaw"]).
S
SuperAGI
@transformeroptimus_superagi
Evidence RankedBuilder#404
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
26.84
Rank
#404
7d Change
—
Score
71.5
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub75.9
Packages—
Deps—
Docs59
Discourse11.19
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps69.69
Docs84
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #90000 → #90000
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9236 → 71.5
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
No recent signals
Dev activity118d ago
Repo spike118d ago
Dev activity118d ago
Repo spike118d ago
Dev activity118d ago