cognee vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares cognee and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=topoteretes_cognee,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["topoteretes_cognee","openclaw"]).
c
cognee
@topoteretes_cognee
Evidence RankedBuilder#28
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
52.3
Rank
#28
7d Change
—
Score
70.96
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub78.37
Packages73.95
Deps—
Docs94
Discourse12.1
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps88.17
Docs84
Discourse30.66
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #64 → #64
Score: 6758 → 52.3
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9238 → 70.96
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
No recent signals
Dev activity166d ago
Repo spike166d ago
Dev activity166d ago
Repo spike166d ago
Dev activity166d ago