SuperAGI vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares SuperAGI and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=superagi,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["superagi","openclaw"]).
SuperAGI
@superagi
Evidence RankedBuilder#102
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
39.88
Rank
#102
7d Change
+22
Score
71.5
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub75.89
Packages—
Deps—
Docs59
Discourse11.19
Ecosystem56.95
Coverage: medium
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps69.69
Docs84
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #151 → #151
Score: 5472 → 39.88
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9237 → 71.5
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike135d ago
Repo spike136d ago
Repo spike137d ago
Repo spike137d ago
Repo spike138d ago
Dev activity135d ago
Repo spike135d ago
Dev activity135d ago
Repo spike135d ago
Dev activity135d ago