superqode vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares superqode and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=superagenticai_superqode,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["superagenticai_superqode","openclaw"]).
s
superqode
@superagenticai_superqode
Evidence RankedBuilder#974
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
19.29
Rank
#974
7d Change
—
Score
71.49
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub45.75
Packages—
Deps—
Docs—
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps69.66
Docs84
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1296 → #1296
Score: 300 → 19.29
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9236 → 71.49
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
No recent signals
Dev activity114d ago
Repo spike114d ago
Dev activity114d ago
Repo spike114d ago
Dev activity115d ago