Superagent vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares Superagent and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=superagent,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["superagent","openclaw"]).
Superagent
@superagent
Evidence RankedFramework#149
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
34.55
Rank
#149
7d Change
+24
Score
74.5
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub71.66
Packages—
Deps—
Docs78
Discourse8.6
Ecosystem1.06
Coverage: medium
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps87.7
Docs84
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #87 → #87
Score: 6583 → 34.55
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9237 → 74.5
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike140d ago
Repo spike140d ago
Repo spike141d ago
Repo spike141d ago
Repo spike142d ago
Dev activity139d ago
Repo spike139d ago
Dev activity140d ago
Repo spike140d ago
Dev activity140d ago