Peekaboo vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares Peekaboo and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=steipete_peekaboo,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["steipete_peekaboo","openclaw"]).
P
Peekaboo
@steipete_peekaboo
Evidence RankedOperator#260
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
29.84
Rank
#260
7d Change
—
Score
70.96
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub80.72
Packages—
Deps—
Docs72
Discourse24.6
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps88.17
Docs84
Discourse30.66
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #290 → #290
Score: 4866 → 29.84
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9238 → 70.96
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike13h ago
Repo spike17h ago
Repo spike21h ago
Repo spike1d ago
Dev activity1d ago
Dev activity164d ago
Repo spike164d ago
Dev activity164d ago
Repo spike164d ago
Dev activity165d ago