steel-browser vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares steel-browser and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=steel_dev_steel_browser,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["steel_dev_steel_browser","openclaw"]).
s
steel-browser
@steel_dev_steel_browser
Evidence RankedOperator#259
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
29.9
Rank
#259
7d Change
—
Score
70.97
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub77.56
Packages—
Deps—
Docs87
Discourse16.67
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps88.28
Docs84
Discourse30.66
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #259 → #259
Score: 4950 → 29.9
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9239 → 70.97
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike47d ago
Repo spike48d ago
Dev activity49d ago
Repo spike49d ago
Dev activity59d ago
Dev activity176d ago
Repo spike176d ago
Dev activity176d ago
Repo spike176d ago
Dev activity177d ago