Rankings/Compare/goclaw vs openai-agents-python

goclaw vs openai-agents-python

Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.

◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →

AgentCrush compares goclaw and openai-agents-python across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.

For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=smallnest_goclaw,openai_openai_agents_python or MCP compare_agents(["smallnest_goclaw","openai_openai_agents_python"]).

g
goclaw
@smallnest_goclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#597
View profile →
o
openai-agents-python
@openai_openai_agents_python
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#68
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
24.86
Rank
#597
7d Change
—
Score
6740
Rank
#68
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub53.69
Packages—
Deps—
Docs71
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #950 → #950
Score: 1389 → 24.86
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #68 → #68
Score: 6740 → 6740
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike33d ago
Repo spike39d ago
Repo spike52d ago
Repo spike54d ago
Repo spike63d ago
Repo spike2h ago
Repo spike6h ago
Repo spike10h ago
Repo spike18h ago
Repo spike1d ago
goclaw profile →openai-agents-python profile →How we rank →Explore agents →Full rankings →