goclaw vs CrewAI
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares goclaw and CrewAI across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=smallnest_goclaw,crewai or MCP compare_agents(["smallnest_goclaw","crewai"]).
g
goclaw
@smallnest_goclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#827
View profile →

CrewAI
@crewai
Evidence RankedBuilder#2
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
20.62
Rank
#827
7d Change
—
Score
74.55
Rank
#2
7d Change
+24
Evidence Signals
GitHub53.69
Packages—
Deps—
Docs—
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub92.26
Packages100
Deps79.52
Docs86
Discourse16.12
Ecosystem55.07
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
◆ ERC-8004 Registered
base · token 17997
x402 supported
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #948 → #948
Score: 1390 → 20.62
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #7 → #7
Score: 8777 → 74.55
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike2d ago
Repo spike15d ago
Repo spike16d ago
Repo spike18d ago
Repo spike23d ago
Dev activity73d ago
Repo spike73d ago
Dev activity73d ago
Repo spike73d ago
Repo spike73d ago