doctor vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares doctor and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=sisig_ai_doctor,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["sisig_ai_doctor","openclaw"]).
d
doctor
@sisig_ai_doctor
Evidence RankedOperator#724
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
23.39
Rank
#724
7d Change
—
Score
70.93
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub48.18
Packages—
Deps—
Docs57
Discourse27.26
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps88
Docs84
Discourse30.66
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #978 → #978
Score: 1331 → 23.39
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9238 → 70.93
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike18d ago
Repo spike76d ago
Dev activity163d ago
Repo spike163d ago
Dev activity163d ago
Repo spike163d ago
Dev activity163d ago