TapeAgents vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares TapeAgents and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=servicenow_tapeagents,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["servicenow_tapeagents","openclaw"]).
T
TapeAgents
@servicenow_tapeagents
Evidence RankedOperator#334
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
28.25
Rank
#334
7d Change
—
Score
71.5
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub48.14
Packages0
Deps—
Docs78
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps69.69
Docs84
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #666 → #666
Score: 2752 → 28.25
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9237 → 71.5
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike38d ago
Repo spike101d ago
Repo spike111d ago
Repo spike120d ago
Repo spike122d ago
Dev activity129d ago
Repo spike129d ago
Dev activity129d ago
Repo spike129d ago
Dev activity129d ago