Agent-Smith vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares Agent-Smith and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=sail_sg_agent_smith,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["sail_sg_agent_smith","openclaw"]).
A
Agent-Smith
@sail_sg_agent_smith
Evidence RankedOperator#1079
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
17.08
Rank
#1079
7d Change
—
Score
77.14
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub32.47
Packages—
Deps—
Docs—
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.27
Docs90
Discourse98.64
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1109 → #1109
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #28 → #28
Score: 7900 → 77.14
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike8d ago
Repo spike12d ago
Repo spike24d ago
Dev activity36d ago
Repo spike36d ago
Dev activity37d ago
Repo spike37d ago
Dev activity37d ago