ruflo vs lobehub
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares ruflo and lobehub across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=ruvnet_ruflo,lobehub_lobehub or MCP compare_agents(["ruvnet_ruflo","lobehub_lobehub"]).
r
ruflo
@ruvnet_ruflo
Evidence RankedBuilder#39
View profile →
l
lobehub
@lobehub_lobehub
Evidence RankedOperator#40
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
44.87
Rank
#39
7d Change
—
Score
44.54
Rank
#40
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub99.36
Packages—
Deps—
Docs90
Discourse15.12
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub100
Packages—
Deps—
Docs92
Discourse8.82
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #37 → #37
Score: 6900 → 44.87
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #32 → #32
Score: 6950 → 44.54
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike2h ago
Dev activity6h ago
Repo spike6h ago
Dev activity10h ago
Repo spike10h ago
Dev activity2h ago
Repo spike2h ago
Dev activity6h ago
Repo spike6h ago
Dev activity10h ago