ruflo vs open-multi-agent
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares ruflo and open-multi-agent across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=ruvnet_ruflo,jackchen_me_open_multi_agent or MCP compare_agents(["ruvnet_ruflo","jackchen_me_open_multi_agent"]).
r
ruflo
@ruvnet_ruflo
Evidence RankedBuilder#40
View profile →
o
open-multi-agent
@jackchen_me_open_multi_agent
Evidence RankedOperator#41
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
44.08
Rank
#40
7d Change
—
Score
44
Rank
#41
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub99.32
Packages—
Deps—
Docs83
Discourse15.12
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub85.58
Packages35.07
Deps—
Docs80
Discourse14.69
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #37 → #37
Score: 6897 → 44.08
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #80 → #80
Score: 6405 → 44
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike1h ago
Dev activity5h ago
Repo spike5h ago
New release5h ago
Repo spike9h ago
Dev activity5h ago
Repo spike5h ago
Dev activity9h ago
Repo spike9h ago
Dev activity13h ago