Peekaboo vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares Peekaboo and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=openclaw_peekaboo,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["openclaw_peekaboo","openclaw"]).
P
Peekaboo
@openclaw_peekaboo
Evidence RankedOperator#283
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
29.09
Rank
#283
7d Change
—
Score
74.5
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub80.52
Packages—
Deps—
Docs72
Discourse16.1
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps87.7
Docs84
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #284 → #284
Score: 4859 → 29.09
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9237 → 74.5
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity7h ago
Repo spike7h ago
Dev activity15h ago
Repo spike15h ago
Dev activity19h ago
Dev activity139d ago
Repo spike139d ago
Dev activity140d ago
Repo spike140d ago
Dev activity140d ago