ChatDev vs cognee
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares ChatDev and cognee across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=openbmb_chatdev,topoteretes_cognee or MCP compare_agents(["openbmb_chatdev","topoteretes_cognee"]).
C
ChatDev
@openbmb_chatdev
Evidence RankedOperator#47
View profile →
c
cognee
@topoteretes_cognee
Evidence RankedBuilder#102
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
43.08
Rank
#47
7d Change
—
Score
32.21
Rank
#102
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub95.86
Packages—
Deps—
Docs84
Discourse12.02
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub83.37
Packages—
Deps—
Docs91
Discourse28.79
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1237 → #1237
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #300 → #300
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike7m ago
Repo spike8h ago
Repo spike16h ago
Repo spike20h ago
Repo spike1d ago
No recent signals