OpenContracts vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares OpenContracts and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=open_source_legal_opencontracts,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["open_source_legal_opencontracts","openclaw"]).
O
OpenContracts
@open_source_legal_opencontracts
Evidence RankedBuilder#408
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
27.63
Rank
#408
7d Change
—
Score
70.96
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub72.15
Packages—
Deps—
Docs82
Discourse5.24
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps88.17
Docs84
Discourse30.66
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #410 → #410
Score: 4592 → 27.63
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9238 → 70.96
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike3d ago
Repo spike3d ago
Repo spike4d ago
Dev activity170d ago
Repo spike170d ago
Dev activity170d ago
Repo spike170d ago
Dev activity170d ago