npcpy vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares npcpy and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. Both are indexed but not yet evidence-ranked. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=npc_worldwide_npcpy,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["npc_worldwide_npcpy","openclaw"]).
n
npcpy
@npc_worldwide_npcpy
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceResearcher#417
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
4591
Rank
#417
7d Change
—
Score
9238
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence SignalsEvidence ranking not yet assigned
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Trust Context
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #417 → #417
Score: 4591 → 4591
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9238 → 9238
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike3d ago
Dev activity4d ago
Dev activity4d ago
Repo spike5d ago
Dev activity5d ago
Dev activity163d ago
Repo spike163d ago
Dev activity163d ago
Repo spike163d ago
Dev activity164d ago