ScreenAgent vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares ScreenAgent and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=niuzaisheng_screenagent,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["niuzaisheng_screenagent","openclaw"]).
S
ScreenAgent
@niuzaisheng_screenagent
Evidence RankedOperator#679
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
22.28
Rank
#679
7d Change
—
Score
76.11
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub44.65
Packages—
Deps—
Docs58
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.58
Docs90
Discourse88.98
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #945 → #945
Score: 1393 → 22.28
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9233 → 76.11
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike9h ago
Repo spike13h ago
Repo spike3d ago
Repo spike9d ago
Repo spike16d ago
Dev activity74d ago
Repo spike74d ago
Dev activity74d ago
Repo spike74d ago
Dev activity74d ago