inkos vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares inkos and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=narcooo_inkos,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["narcooo_inkos","openclaw"]).
i
inkos
@narcooo_inkos
Evidence RankedOperator#243
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
30.3
Rank
#243
7d Change
—
Score
9238
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub87.81
Packages—
Deps—
Docs68
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #240 → #240
Score: 5014 → 30.3
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9238 → 9238
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike2h ago
Repo spike6h ago
Repo spike10h ago
Repo spike14h ago
Repo spike18h ago
Dev activity163d ago
Repo spike163d ago
Dev activity164d ago
Repo spike164d ago
Dev activity164d ago