manifest vs zcf
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares manifest and zcf across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=mnfst_manifest,ufomiao_zcf or MCP compare_agents(["mnfst_manifest","ufomiao_zcf"]).
m
manifest
@mnfst_manifest
Evidence RankedTrader#31
View profile →
z
zcf
@ufomiao_zcf
Evidence RankedBuilder#32
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
47.17
Rank
#31
7d Change
—
Score
46.82
Rank
#32
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub82.94
Packages46.94
Deps—
Docs75
Discourse29.75
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
GitHub81.45
Packages49.23
Deps—
Docs80
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #89 → #89
Score: 6436 → 47.17
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #92 → #92
Score: 6392 → 46.82
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity14h ago
Repo spike14h ago
Dev activity18h ago
Repo spike18h ago
Dev activity22h ago
Repo spike2d ago
Dev activity5d ago
Dev activity6d ago
Dev activity6d ago
Dev activity6d ago