Rankings/Compare/slidev-ai vs OpenClaw Agents

slidev-ai vs OpenClaw Agents

Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.

◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →

AgentCrush compares slidev-ai and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.

For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=lstm_kirigaya_slidev_ai,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["lstm_kirigaya_slidev_ai","openclaw"]).

s
slidev-ai
@lstm_kirigaya_slidev_ai
Evidence RankedOperator#1002
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
18.55
Rank
#1002
7d Change
Score
76.11
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub41.3
Packages
Deps
Docs
Discourse
Ecosystem
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.58
Docs90
Discourse88.98
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1028 → #1028
Score: 122518.55
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 923376.11
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike5d ago
Repo spike22d ago
Repo spike23d ago
Repo spike27d ago
Repo spike29d ago
Dev activity72d ago
Repo spike72d ago
Dev activity73d ago
Repo spike73d ago
Dev activity73d ago
slidev-ai profile →OpenClaw Agents profile →How we rank →Explore agents →Full rankings →