openmcp-client vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares openmcp-client and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=lstm_kirigaya_openmcp_client,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["lstm_kirigaya_openmcp_client","openclaw"]).
o
openmcp-client
@lstm_kirigaya_openmcp_client
Evidence RankedBuilder#621
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
24.65
Rank
#621
7d Change
—
Score
70.96
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub53.39
Packages—
Deps—
Docs69
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps88.17
Docs84
Discourse30.66
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #937 → #937
Score: 1438 → 24.65
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9238 → 70.96
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike33d ago
Repo spike40d ago
Repo spike43d ago
Repo spike88d ago
Repo spike104d ago
Dev activity164d ago
Repo spike164d ago
Dev activity164d ago
Repo spike164d ago
Dev activity164d ago