lobu vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares lobu and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=lobu_ai_lobu,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["lobu_ai_lobu","openclaw"]).
l
lobu
@lobu_ai_lobu
Evidence RankedOperator#671
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
21.26
Rank
#671
7d Change
+5
Score
78.68
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub55.06
Packages—
Deps—
Docs—
Discourse25
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub100
Packages100
Deps69.2
Docs90
Discourse98.68
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #121 → #121
Score: 340 → 21.26
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #28 → #28
Score: 7900 → 78.68
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity8h ago
Dev activity12h ago
Dev activity16h ago
Dev activity20h ago
Dev activity1d ago
Dev activity27d ago
Repo spike27d ago
Dev activity27d ago
Repo spike27d ago
Dev activity28d ago