lobu vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares lobu and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=lobu_ai_lobu,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["lobu_ai_lobu","openclaw"]).
l
lobu
@lobu_ai_lobu
Evidence RankedOperator#962
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
20.27
Rank
#962
7d Change
+5
Score
70.96
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub57.84
Packages—
Deps—
Docs—
Discourse7.5
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps88.17
Docs84
Discourse30.66
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #122 → #122
Score: 340 → 20.27
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #28 → #28
Score: 7900 → 70.96
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity13m ago
New release13m ago
Dev activity4h ago
Dev activity12h ago
Dev activity16h ago
Dev activity166d ago
Repo spike166d ago
Dev activity166d ago
Repo spike166d ago
Dev activity166d ago