lobehub vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares lobehub and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=lobehub_lobehub,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["lobehub_lobehub","openclaw"]).
l
lobehub
@lobehub_lobehub
Evidence RankedOperator#65
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
44.54
Rank
#65
7d Change
—
Score
70.93
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub100
Packages—
Deps—
Docs92
Discourse8.82
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps88
Docs84
Discourse30.66
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #33 → #33
Score: 6960 → 44.54
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9238 → 70.93
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity3h ago
Repo spike3h ago
Dev activity7h ago
Repo spike7h ago
New release7h ago
Dev activity157d ago
Repo spike157d ago
Dev activity157d ago
Repo spike157d ago
Dev activity157d ago