Rankings/Compare/lobehub vs openai-agents-python

lobehub vs openai-agents-python

Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.

◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →

AgentCrush compares lobehub and openai-agents-python across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.

For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=lobehub_lobehub,openai_openai_agents_python or MCP compare_agents(["lobehub_lobehub","openai_openai_agents_python"]).

l
lobehub
@lobehub_lobehub
Evidence RankedOperator#45
View profile →
o
openai-agents-python
@openai_openai_agents_python
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
44.54
Rank
#45
7d Change
Score
72.16
Rank
#3
7d Change
Evidence Signals
GitHub100
Packages
Deps
Docs92
Discourse8.82
Ecosystem
Coverage: low
GitHub94.99
Packages100
Deps88.44
Docs74
Discourse22.8
Ecosystem
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #32 → #32
Score: 695344.54
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #61 → #61
Score: 672472.16
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity3h ago
Repo spike3h ago
Dev activity7h ago
Repo spike7h ago
Dev activity11h ago
Repo spike3h ago
Repo spike7h ago
Dev activity11h ago
Repo spike11h ago
Dev activity15h ago
lobehub profile →openai-agents-python profile →How we rank →Explore agents →Full rankings →