lmnr vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares lmnr and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=lmnr_ai_lmnr,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["lmnr_ai_lmnr","openclaw"]).
l
lmnr
@lmnr_ai_lmnr
Evidence RankedBuilder#257
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
28.31
Rank
#257
7d Change
—
Score
76.11
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub76.31
Packages—
Deps—
Docs67
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.58
Docs90
Discourse88.98
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #327 → #327
Score: 4747 → 28.31
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9233 → 76.11
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike9h ago
Repo spike17h ago
Repo spike1d ago
Dev activity1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Dev activity72d ago
Repo spike72d ago
Dev activity73d ago
Repo spike73d ago
Dev activity73d ago