lmnr vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares lmnr and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=lmnr_ai_lmnr,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["lmnr_ai_lmnr","openclaw"]).
l
lmnr
@lmnr_ai_lmnr
Evidence RankedBuilder#184
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
28.24
Rank
#184
7d Change
—
Score
78.68
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub75.94
Packages—
Deps—
Docs67
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub100
Packages100
Deps69.2
Docs90
Discourse98.68
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #455 → #455
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #28 → #28
Score: 7900 → 78.68
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity3h ago
Dev activity7h ago
Dev activity11h ago
Repo spike11h ago
Dev activity23h ago
Dev activity27d ago
Repo spike27d ago
Dev activity27d ago
Repo spike27d ago
Dev activity28d ago