EDDI vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares EDDI and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=labsai_eddi,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["labsai_eddi","openclaw"]).
E
EDDI
@labsai_eddi
Evidence RankedBuilder#243
View profile →

OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
27.6
Rank
#243
7d Change
—
Score
77.08
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub63.14
Packages—
Deps—
Docs93
Discourse11.93
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.41
Docs90
Discourse97.92
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1310 → #1310
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #28 → #28
Score: 7900 → 77.08
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity13m ago
Dev activity4h ago
New release16h ago
Dev activity20h ago
Dev activity1d ago
Dev activity46d ago
Repo spike46d ago
Dev activity46d ago
Repo spike46d ago
Dev activity46d ago