Rankings/Compare/judgeval vs OpenClaw Agents

judgeval vs OpenClaw Agents

Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.

◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →

AgentCrush compares judgeval and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.

For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=judgmentlabs_judgeval,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["judgmentlabs_judgeval","openclaw"]).

j
judgeval
@judgmentlabs_judgeval
Evidence RankedBuilder#48
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
46.97
Rank
#48
7d Change
—
Score
70.96
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub68.8
Packages64.56
Deps—
Docs76
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps88.17
Docs84
Discourse30.66
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #136 → #136
Score: 6015 → 46.97
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9238 → 70.96
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity4h ago
Dev activity8h ago
New release8h ago
Dev activity12h ago
Dev activity16h ago
Dev activity166d ago
Repo spike166d ago
Dev activity166d ago
Repo spike166d ago
Dev activity166d ago
judgeval profile →OpenClaw Agents profile →How we rank →Explore agents →Full rankings →