judgeval vs openai-agents-python
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares judgeval and openai-agents-python across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=judgmentlabs_judgeval,openai_openai_agents_python or MCP compare_agents(["judgmentlabs_judgeval","openai_openai_agents_python"]).
j
judgeval
@judgmentlabs_judgeval
Evidence RankedBuilder#33
View profile →
o
openai-agents-python
@openai_openai_agents_python
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
47.26
Rank
#33
7d Change
—
Score
72.5
Rank
#1
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub68.63
Packages66.06
Deps—
Docs76
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
GitHub95.39
Packages100
Deps89.95
Docs74
Discourse22.8
Ecosystem—
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #115 → #115
Score: 6013 → 47.26
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #66 → #66
Score: 6734 → 72.5
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity3d ago
Dev activity6d ago
Repo spike6d ago
Dev activity8d ago
New release8d ago
Repo spike9h ago
Dev activity1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Dev activity1d ago
Repo spike1d ago