judgeval vs obscura
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares judgeval and obscura across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=judgmentlabs_judgeval,h4ckf0r0day_obscura or MCP compare_agents(["judgmentlabs_judgeval","h4ckf0r0day_obscura"]).
j
judgeval
@judgmentlabs_judgeval
Evidence RankedBuilder#34
View profile →
o
obscura
@h4ckf0r0day_obscura
Evidence RankedOperator#35
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
46.93
Rank
#34
7d Change
—
Score
46.9
Rank
#35
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub68.64
Packages64.56
Deps—
Docs76
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
GitHub93.12
Packages—
Deps—
Docs87
Discourse48.83
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #115 → #115
Score: 6013 → 46.93
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #69 → #69
Score: 6717 → 46.9
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike9h ago
Dev activity1d ago
Repo spike2d ago
Dev activity8d ago
Dev activity11d ago
Repo spike1h ago
Repo spike5h ago
Repo spike9h ago
Repo spike13h ago
Repo spike17h ago