joycode-agent vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares joycode-agent and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. Both are indexed but not yet evidence-ranked. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=jd_opensource_joycode_agent,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["jd_opensource_joycode_agent","openclaw"]).
j
joycode-agent
@jd_opensource_joycode_agent
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceBuilder#1019
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
1268
Rank
#1019
7d Change
—
Score
9239
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence SignalsEvidence ranking not yet assigned
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Trust Context
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1019 → #1019
Score: 1268 → 1268
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9239 → 9239
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike62d ago
Repo spike64d ago
Repo spike65d ago
Repo spike69d ago
Repo spike81d ago
Dev activity170d ago
Repo spike170d ago
Dev activity170d ago
Repo spike170d ago
Dev activity171d ago