opencli vs Stirrup
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares opencli and Stirrup across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=jackwener_opencli,artificialanalysis_stirrup or MCP compare_agents(["jackwener_opencli","artificialanalysis_stirrup"]).
o
opencli
@jackwener_opencli
Evidence RankedOperator#17
View profile →
S
Stirrup
@artificialanalysis_stirrup
Evidence RankedOperator#18
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
54.45
Rank
#17
7d Change
—
Score
54.38
Rank
#18
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub79.68
Packages66
Deps48.45
Docs82
Discourse13.97
Ecosystem—
Coverage: high
GitHub63.97
Packages63.21
Deps71.39
Docs78
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #66 → #66
Score: 6726 → 54.45
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #116 → #116
Score: 5871 → 54.38
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
No recent signals
Repo spike14h ago
Repo spike3d ago
Repo spike3d ago
Repo spike3d ago
Repo spike4d ago