open-multi-agent vs lobehub
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares open-multi-agent and lobehub across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=jackchen_me_open_multi_agent,lobehub_lobehub or MCP compare_agents(["jackchen_me_open_multi_agent","lobehub_lobehub"]).
o
open-multi-agent
@jackchen_me_open_multi_agent
Evidence RankedOperator#38
View profile →
l
lobehub
@lobehub_lobehub
Evidence RankedOperator#39
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
44.57
Rank
#38
7d Change
—
Score
44.54
Rank
#39
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub85.51
Packages35.07
Deps—
Docs80
Discourse19.96
Ecosystem—
Coverage: medium
GitHub100
Packages—
Deps—
Docs92
Discourse8.82
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #79 → #79
Score: 6403 → 44.57
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #31 → #31
Score: 6949 → 44.54
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity3h ago
Dev activity7h ago
Dev activity11h ago
Dev activity15h ago
Repo spike15h ago
Dev activity3h ago
Repo spike3h ago
Dev activity7h ago
Repo spike7h ago
Dev activity11h ago