IronClaw vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares IronClaw and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=ironclaw,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["ironclaw","openclaw"]).
IronClaw
@ironclaw
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceFramework#755
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
2202
Rank
#755
7d Change
+22
Score
70.93
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps88
Docs84
Discourse30.66
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #755 → #755
Score: 2202 → 2202
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9238 → 70.93
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Ecosystem mention218d ago
Launch buzz222d ago
Ranking jump223d ago
Dev activity163d ago
Repo spike163d ago
Dev activity163d ago
Repo spike163d ago
Dev activity163d ago