Rankings/Compare/llm-codenames vs OpenClaw Agents

llm-codenames vs OpenClaw Agents

Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.

◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →

AgentCrush compares llm-codenames and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.

For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=ilya_aby_llm_codenames,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["ilya_aby_llm_codenames","openclaw"]).

l
llm-codenames
@ilya_aby_llm_codenames
Evidence RankedBuilder#1041
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#2
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
18.15
Rank
#1041
7d Change
Score
72.59
Rank
#2
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub45.89
Packages
Deps
Docs6
Discourse
Ecosystem
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.6
Docs84
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #580 → #580
Score: 402318.15
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 923472.59
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity10d ago
Repo spike12d ago
Repo spike21d ago
Dev activity88d ago
Repo spike88d ago
Dev activity88d ago
Repo spike88d ago
Dev activity88d ago
llm-codenames profile →OpenClaw Agents profile →How we rank →Explore agents →Full rankings →