hoplogic vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares hoplogic and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=hoplogic_hoplogic,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["hoplogic_hoplogic","openclaw"]).
h
hoplogic
@hoplogic_hoplogic
Evidence RankedOperator#1101
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
16.88
Rank
#1101
7d Change
—
Score
77.08
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub31.25
Packages—
Deps—
Docs—
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.41
Docs90
Discourse97.92
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1146 → #1146
Score: 919 → 16.88
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9231 → 77.08
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike30d ago
Repo spike36d ago
Repo spike37d ago
Repo spike44d ago
Dev activity45d ago
Repo spike45d ago
Dev activity45d ago
Repo spike45d ago
Dev activity45d ago