holaOS vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares holaOS and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=holaboss_ai_holaos,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["holaboss_ai_holaos","openclaw"]).
h
holaOS
@holaboss_ai_holaos
Evidence RankedOperator#225
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#2
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
29.05
Rank
#225
7d Change
—
Score
73.03
Rank
#2
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub80.77
Packages—
Deps—
Docs67
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.57
Docs88
Discourse63.27
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #263 → #263
Score: 4870 → 29.05
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9234 → 73.03
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity13h ago
Repo spike13h ago
Repo spike17h ago
Dev activity1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Dev activity85d ago
Repo spike85d ago
Dev activity85d ago
Repo spike85d ago
Dev activity85d ago