holaOS vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares holaOS and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=holaboss_ai_holaos,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["holaboss_ai_holaos","openclaw"]).
h
holaOS
@holaboss_ai_holaos
Evidence RankedOperator#192
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
28.45
Rank
#192
7d Change
—
Score
77.07
Rank
#1
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub75.7
Packages—
Deps—
Docs70
Discourse—
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.36
Docs90
Discourse97.92
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #242 → #242
Score: 4870 → 28.45
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9231 → 77.07
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Dev activity1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike1d ago
Repo spike2d ago
Dev activity39d ago
Repo spike39d ago
Dev activity40d ago
Repo spike40d ago
Dev activity40d ago