hatchet vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares hatchet and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=hatchet_dev_hatchet,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["hatchet_dev_hatchet","openclaw"]).
h
hatchet
@hatchet_dev_hatchet
Evidence RankedOperator#144
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#2
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
30.92
Rank
#144
7d Change
—
Score
73.14
Rank
#2
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
GitHub82.91
Packages—
Deps—
Docs80
Discourse25.13
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
GitHub93
Packages100
Deps69.57
Docs88
Discourse64.24
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #226 → #226
Score: 4942 → 30.92
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9234 → 73.14
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike3h ago
Dev activity11h ago
Repo spike15h ago
Dev activity19h ago
Repo spike19h ago
Dev activity80d ago
Repo spike80d ago
Dev activity80d ago
Repo spike80d ago
Dev activity80d ago