ocode vs OpenClaw Agents
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares ocode and OpenClaw Agents across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=haasonsaas_ocode,openclaw or MCP compare_agents(["haasonsaas_ocode","openclaw"]).
o
ocode
@haasonsaas_ocode
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceBuilder#1131
View profile →
OpenClaw Agents
@openclaw
Evidence RankedOperator#3
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
1054
Rank
#1131
7d Change
—
Score
70.93
Rank
#3
7d Change
+19
Evidence Signals
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
GitHub88
Packages100
Deps88
Docs84
Discourse30.66
Ecosystem5.68
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1131 → #1131
Score: 1054 → 1054
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #3 → #3
Score: 9238 → 70.93
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike92d ago
Repo spike104d ago
Dev activity155d ago
Repo spike155d ago
Dev activity163d ago
Repo spike163d ago
Dev activity163d ago
Repo spike163d ago
Dev activity163d ago