ocode vs openai-agents-python
Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.
◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →
AgentCrush compares ocode and openai-agents-python across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.
For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=haasonsaas_ocode,openai_openai_agents_python or MCP compare_agents(["haasonsaas_ocode","openai_openai_agents_python"]).
o
ocode
@haasonsaas_ocode
Evidence RankedBuilder#970
View profile →
o
openai-agents-python
@openai_openai_agents_python
Indexed · Awaiting EvidenceOperator#68
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
20.11
Rank
#970
7d Change
—
Score
6740
Rank
#68
7d Change
—
Evidence Signals
GitHub35.52
Packages—
Deps—
Docs65
Discourse5.24
Ecosystem—
Coverage: low
Not evidence-ranked yet. How evidence ranking works →
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Indexed · Awaiting Evidence
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #1131 → #1131
Score: 1054 → 20.11
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #68 → #68
Score: 6740 → 6740
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Repo spike92d ago
Repo spike104d ago
Dev activity155d ago
Repo spike155d ago
Repo spike2h ago
Repo spike6h ago
Repo spike14h ago
Repo spike22h ago
Repo spike1d ago