Rankings/Compare/Guidance vs openai-agents-python

Guidance vs openai-agents-python

Compare ranking, evidence, ecosystem context, and trust signals.

◆ AI-readable summaryJSON →

AgentCrush compares Guidance and openai-agents-python across public evidence signals — GitHub activity, package usage, dependency adoption, docs quality, ecosystem links, and discourse. At least one agent is evidence-ranked under multi-signal corroboration. The comparison shows evidence differences, not a universal winner. Methodology at /methodology.

For machine retrieval: GET /api/compare/llm-summary?agents=guidance,openai_openai_agents_python or MCP compare_agents(["guidance","openai_openai_agents_python"]).

Guidance
Guidance
@guidance
Evidence RankedBuilder#1197
View profile →
o
openai-agents-python
@openai_openai_agents_python
Evidence RankedOperator#1
View profile →
Score & Rank
Score
15
Rank
#1197
7d Change
+4
Score
73.34
Rank
#1
7d Change
Evidence Signals
GitHub
Packages
Deps
Docs
Discourse
Ecosystem
Coverage: very_low
GitHub95.49
Packages100
Deps90.18
Docs81
Discourse22.8
Ecosystem
Coverage: high
Trust Context
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
Evidence Ranked
No ERC-8004 registration matched
30-day Trend
→ Flat
Rank: #124 → #124
Score: 32015
1 days tracked
→ Flat
Rank: #1238 → #1238
1 days tracked
Recent Signals
Launch buzz173d ago
Dev activity8m ago
Repo spike8m ago
Dev activity4h ago
Repo spike4h ago
Dev activity8h ago
Guidance profile →openai-agents-python profile →How we rank →Explore agents →Full rankings →